<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New IB data plugin v1.6.8 released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/</link>
	<description>News, Announcements, and more... directly from AmiBroker.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:59:09 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hnm</title>
		<link>http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>hnm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 18:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/#comment-280</guid>
		<description>It seems that Volume as sent the IB plugin is reported in blocks of 100 such that
the Volume number needs to be multiplied by 100 to reflect more correct Volume for
the given stock.

Can someone update the IB plugin to show more correct Volume from the IB data feed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that Volume as sent the IB plugin is reported in blocks of 100 such that<br />
the Volume number needs to be multiplied by 100 to reflect more correct Volume for<br />
the given stock.</p>
<p>Can someone update the IB plugin to show more correct Volume from the IB data feed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/#comment-266</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to jump in here and vote for both, IB daily backfill, and more than 30 days of intraday backfill. 
I understand the IB issues, 
30 days backfill is just fine for trading.
But it&#039;s nice to have about 3 months of continuous intraday quotes for testing against.  

One other request ... for variable backfill periods based on how much data already exists for the symbol.  I usually leave my backfill at 1 or 5 days.  But when I add a new symbol, I have to go back and change it to 30 days.  It would be nice to leave it at 30 days.. and then have AB only backfill what&#039;s needed.  ie, if a symbol just needed 1 day, that&#039;s all it would get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to jump in here and vote for both, IB daily backfill, and more than 30 days of intraday backfill.<br />
I understand the IB issues,<br />
30 days backfill is just fine for trading.<br />
But it&#8217;s nice to have about 3 months of continuous intraday quotes for testing against.  </p>
<p>One other request &#8230; for variable backfill periods based on how much data already exists for the symbol.  I usually leave my backfill at 1 or 5 days.  But when I add a new symbol, I have to go back and change it to 30 days.  It would be nice to leave it at 30 days.. and then have AB only backfill what&#8217;s needed.  ie, if a symbol just needed 1 day, that&#8217;s all it would get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olig</title>
		<link>http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>olig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/#comment-243</guid>
		<description>great and thanks and then only AB :-))))))))))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great and thanks and then only AB :-))))))))))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomasz Janeczko</title>
		<link>http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Janeczko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/#comment-242</guid>
		<description>Yes, I will add that in some of the future versions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I will add that in some of the future versions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olig</title>
		<link>http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>olig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/#comment-241</guid>
		<description>no, for me are the 30 days intraday enough.
But the DAILY 180 days for the higher time frames (where is the main direction etc.), because like i said, the is no chance with amiquote for the futures and have always to jump to quotetracker for more historical charts or to import from there to AB

will you include this posibility or is there a plan/version for the next ib plugins?
even thanks tomasz for your answers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, for me are the 30 days intraday enough.<br />
But the DAILY 180 days for the higher time frames (where is the main direction etc.), because like i said, the is no chance with amiquote for the futures and have always to jump to quotetracker for more historical charts or to import from there to AB</p>
<p>will you include this posibility or is there a plan/version for the next ib plugins?<br />
even thanks tomasz for your answers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomasz Janeczko</title>
		<link>http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Janeczko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Ah... I did not notice that you mean half a year of DAILY quotes. That&#039;s another story. It does not require multiple requests. I was talking about 180 days of INTRADAY backfill. And this is what I have in my internal version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah&#8230; I did not notice that you mean half a year of DAILY quotes. That&#8217;s another story. It does not require multiple requests. I was talking about 180 days of INTRADAY backfill. And this is what I have in my internal version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomasz Janeczko</title>
		<link>http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Janeczko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/#comment-239</guid>
		<description>QT is doing exactly the same way as AB. Multiple requests and waiting if IB is throttling. There is 
no problem, other than explaining people that IB throttles their requests. Unfortunatelly lots of users do not bother to read the docs and they are surprised that IB backfill is relatively slow.
QT users are used to &quot;low quality&quot; (brokerage-based) sources so they are not surprised, but if one switches from eSignal to IB he/she must be very much surprised how much IB backfill is slower than eSignal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QT is doing exactly the same way as AB. Multiple requests and waiting if IB is throttling. There is<br />
no problem, other than explaining people that IB throttles their requests. Unfortunatelly lots of users do not bother to read the docs and they are surprised that IB backfill is relatively slow.<br />
QT users are used to &#8220;low quality&#8221; (brokerage-based) sources so they are not surprised, but if one switches from eSignal to IB he/she must be very much surprised how much IB backfill is slower than eSignal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olig</title>
		<link>http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>olig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/#comment-238</guid>
		<description>thanks tomasz,

okay, but how is quotetracker doing that stuff then? they have this half year chart from ib, i downloaded it for all futures with any problems?!
and for AM, we can downloaded the futures once a time and save it (even if it is throttling),going on then day by day.
Would be a big help for the future traders. Mean , you can say it to the ib users the problems - so everybody can decide for themselves, to use 36 of the 60 request for it or not, but we CAN, when and if we need it!

thanks, would be a help your internal version (don,t want to jump always between quotetracker and AB)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks tomasz,</p>
<p>okay, but how is quotetracker doing that stuff then? they have this half year chart from ib, i downloaded it for all futures with any problems?!<br />
and for AM, we can downloaded the futures once a time and save it (even if it is throttling),going on then day by day.<br />
Would be a big help for the future traders. Mean , you can say it to the ib users the problems &#8211; so everybody can decide for themselves, to use 36 of the 60 request for it or not, but we CAN, when and if we need it!</p>
<p>thanks, would be a help your internal version (don,t want to jump always between quotetracker and AB)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomasz Janeczko</title>
		<link>http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Janeczko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>I have a internal version that downloads as much but was reluctant to release it due to IB policy
of throttling backfills after 60 requests. Since you can only download in 5 day chunks, it requires 36 requests to get half a year of data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a internal version that downloads as much but was reluctant to release it due to IB policy<br />
of throttling backfills after 60 requests. Since you can only download in 5 day chunks, it requires 36 requests to get half a year of data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olig</title>
		<link>http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>olig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2006/10/09/new-ib-data-plugin-v168-released/#comment-236</guid>
		<description>sorry, i wanted to write tomasz and not tomas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, i wanted to write tomasz and not tomas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

