Comments on: Using redundant signals for entries

By: Tomasz Janeczko

Tomasz Janeczko — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:06:12 +0000

@Mike: One can say that, but right now you should be using version 5.0 that natively supports redunant buy signals (doesn’t remove them) if you use SetBacktestMode( backtestRegularRaw )

@Cam: -1 is special marker meaning – ignore this signal.

By: Cam

Cam — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:01:30 +0000

Whould you please explain why you are using sig.Price != -1 in “if (sig.IsExit() AND sig.Price != -1 )”?

By: MIke

MIke — Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:11:15 +0000

Does the behavior of the example code just emulate the traditional Buy (after redundant signals have been removed and ignoring position score)? Or would the results from the example code be different than the traditional Buy? I’m trying to see if I understand the code. Am I correct in concluding that it is an emulation of Buy?

By: Tomasz Janeczko

Tomasz Janeczko — Wed, 23 May 2007 16:09:32 +0000

Available NOW in 4.96.0 See: http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2007/05/23/amibroker-4960-beta-released/

By: Cam

Cam — Tue, 22 May 2007 02:26:27 +0000

TJ, do you have any better idea that when you gonna implement #105 ?

By: Tomasz Janeczko

Tomasz Janeczko — Fri, 04 May 2007 13:15:09 +0000

Because it is LOW-LEVEL example. ProcessTradeSignals() is medium-level function. http://www.amibroker.com/guide/a_custombacktest.html

In low-level mode we handle signals on our own, and we don’t need/want default signal processing.

By: Edward Pottasch

Edward Pottasch — Fri, 04 May 2007 12:57:33 +0000

why does this code not use bo.ProcessTradeSignals( bar ); ?

By: Tomasz Janeczko

Tomasz Janeczko — Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:34:37 +0000

I think that it will be in 4.92.

By: Edward Pottasch

Edward Pottasch — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 11:36:33 +0000

hi,

is there any news on when this issue #105 will be implemented?

Thanks, Ed

By: Edward Pottasch

Edward Pottasch — Wed, 09 Aug 2006 08:10:59 +0000

that is great news. I didn’t know that. This feedback center is just awesome!